Catharsis: Thoughts on Writing

Avoiding the disappointment of failure inevitably avoids the fulfillment of success. Failure paves the road to success.

About a year ago, I wrote the first installment of what was supposed to be a series on the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity. While working on the second, I found myself debating a Unitarian (someone who rejects the Trinity). I linked him to my article, Essential Trinity: Identity of God. To my surprise, he read it and replied, “He doesn’t actually do what he says he’s going to do — prove the Trinity from Scripture.”

Wait, what?

That took me aback. Of course I did, didn’t I? I reread my article and was shocked to discover that while I addressed many heresies related to the Godhead, I hadn’t done the one thing I set out to do. What should have been a simple reminder to stay on point, revise the introduction, or reassess my goals instead felt like a devastating blow. To be fair, it was just the proverbial final straw that broke my less-than-proverbial back. I’ve barely written since.

Perfectionist

I’m my own worst critic. As a perfectionist, I hold myself to an incredibly high standard, often creating unreasonable or even unattainable goals. When I predictably fail to meet those goals, I’m hard on myself. Over the past year, I’ve written dozens of articles—dozens upon dozens in various stages—totaling over 100,000 words. Yet, most remain unseen because I don’t feel they’re “ready,” and I’d rather avoid the disappointment of putting out work that feels less than professional.

Amateur

Though I’ve never been a full-time writer, I’ve done some freelance work and had articles published in newspapers. I majored in communication with a minor in journalism. I didn’t pursue journalism because, while I loved it, I wasn’t willing to move across the country to scrape by financially. I also didn’t want to deal with the anti-Christian bias that permeates traditional media. So, while I have training, I’m not a “professional,” yet I still hold myself to a nebulous and unrealistic standard, which has led to producing very little.

Motivations

I love to write, but I’ve never been able to do it just for its own sake. I need readers, feedback, and engagement. When my writing doesn’t achieve that, it feels like I’ve failed. What did I do wrong? How could it have been better? Eventually, it became easier to just not write at all. After all, if I don’t write, I can’t fail, right? But chasing validation is exhausting and makes it hard to truly excel at anything. I’m sure my writing has suffered as a result.

No Nothing

The problem with giving up to avoid disappointment is you also avoid success and fulfillment when you succeed. Avoiding the disappointment of failure inevitably avoids the fulfillment of success. Failure paves the road to success. While I’ve written a lot of crumby articles, there are a few I believe are truly exceptional, like The Authority of King Jesus and Embrace Immediate Abolition of Abortion. As the saying goes, you miss 100 percent of the swings you don’t take. And you don’t master something without first failing. These clichés exist for a reason—they’re true.

Conclusion

If you’ve made it this far, thank you for sticking with me. This piece was an exercise to help me get back into writing, a bit of catharsis. I’m not going to commit to any particular article as the next project to come out, but I am actively writing an article on the Trinity (which spurred this article), and another on the Christian Identity movement. We’ll see which one crosses the finish line first.

Avoiding the disappointment of failure inevitably avoids the fulfillment of success. Failure paves the road to success.

Soli Dei Gloria.


Liked what you read? Subscribe for free.

Never miss out — Be notified of my latest articles!


Similar Posts

  • Yahweh Will Accomplish What Concerns Me

    The upside, and a true blessing in all of this, is that it’s operable, with a really high success rate. The downside is that it’s a major invasive surgery that involves removing a tumor on or near nerves and the brain responsible for vital functions. The risk of complications is high enough to make me uncomfortable. While the risk of death is “less than 1 percent”, actually being on the receiving end of that, feels really high. Especially, when, for five years, you’re reminded by the now dormant name of a friend on your friend’s list who died on an operating table due to complications.

  • An Old Testament Defense Against Polygamy

    The New Testament writers don’t introduce this as new — they reiterate what marriage was designed for from the beginning: a picture of Christ’s singular, covenantal love for His Church (Eph. 5:22-33), as this article will show. Polygamy doesn’t just violate a command. It corrupts that picture.

    This argument is essential for understanding and refuting the heresy of so-called “Christian” polygamists and polygynists who believe they are introducing a legitimate, alternate morality that is biblically defensible. It isn’t. It turns the theology of marriage on its head.

  • Life worth living

    For all of my love of language, one thing I struggle to get behind is the idea of “living like there is no tomorrow” or “live like you only have X amount of time to live.” I appreciate the sentiment of not wasting time — but when I take the idea to its logical conclusion,…

  • Working With My Hands: A Man Who Is Autistic

    The neurodivergent community has created a sub-culture which praises, celebrates, and honors a lack of development and immaturity. Spend any amount of time in an active neurodivergent group and you’ll see varied discussions about someone’s “current hyperfixation” or listing of disabilities like scouting merit badges. Their identity has become the disability they argue isn’t a disability.

  • Autistic Identity

    Over the last year, I “self-identified” as autistic because, well, truth be told, autism explained my life history perfectly. All of the “just” excuses became neatly explained behind autism. In spite of this, and at great personal expense, I pushed for a formal diagnosis because I needed to know for sure.

  • Neurodivergent rejecting neurodiversity worldview

    Accepting that you are “neurodivergent” does not mean accepting the ideology of “neurodiversity.” One is a descriptive label. The other is a worldview.

    Used precisely, neurodivergent describes divergence from the most statistically typical neurological profile. It is a categorization — it says nothing about power, justice, or how human beings ought to relate to one another.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *