Open Letter: Challenge to Pro-Aborts

|

To Our Pro-Abortion “Friends,”

There is no shortage of anonymous trolls streaming to criticize us and tell us what we “really believe” or “should believe” on social media. Yet, among the persistent traits common to these profiles is their refusal to articulate their beliefs. Why? Consider this open letter a challenge to these not-so-random anons.

Nullify Abortion: Easy Target

Admittedly, we’re an easy target. We write thousands of words explaining what we believe every month. We respond to critics, write articles, create memes, and put ourselves out there — we even started an actual non-profit and use our real names! We’re not just revolutionaries shouting from the sidelines; we’re reformers, working to build and refine.

We believe: Abortion is Murder

The fact of the matter is: We’re not afraid of what we believe, and we put our names to it. We’re not ashamed to associate with it, and we’re not afraid of the repercussions because we know what we’re doing is righteous, good, legal, and done with integrity. Can our critics say the same? Do they seek to build and reform, or merely to tear down?

Anonymity: Hiding from consequences

We can tell you, with some of the posts we’ve had to delete or hide, we’re confident we know why they are hiding behind anonymous profiles. If we were them, we wouldn’t want our employer or potential employer or even family or friends seeing us engaged in reckless pot shots on social media.

Our Challenge: Come forward

So here’s the challenge: Step into the light. If you disagree with us, choose the path of the reformer, embracing thoughtful engagement over revolutionary upheaval. Write articles that respond to ours, address our arguments, and rise above mere pot shots on social media.

Unless you are willing to engage in open and honest dialogue, we’re going to judiciously refrain from taking the bait. We will not waste our time in constant battles with anonymous trolls who refuse to even represent their beliefs honestly, let alone their identity. We’re interested in constructive discourse, not empty noise.

Consider this post a firm response: Put up or shut up.

Conclusion: Be reformers

Reformers seek to refine and improve, building on principles, values, and shared understanding. Revolution, by contrast, often tears down without regard for what’s left in its wake. Civilization cannot be paradoxically built by tearing it down.

Consider the wisdom of reform over impulsive destruction. Whether you stand with us or against us, the path of thoughtful change leads to genuine impact, while reckless revolution risks undermining us all. We’re here, open and unafraid, embracing a path of constructive dialogue and reform. Can you say the same? Let your convictions, not an anonymous profile, be your voice. After all, true conviction never hides.

In His Majesty’s Service,

Nullify Abortion


Liked what you read? Subscribe for free.

Never miss out — Be notified of my latest articles!


Similar Posts

  • Yahweh Will Accomplish What Concerns Me

    The upside, and a true blessing in all of this, is that it’s operable, with a really high success rate. The downside is that it’s a major invasive surgery that involves removing a tumor on or near nerves and the brain responsible for vital functions. The risk of complications is high enough to make me uncomfortable. While the risk of death is “less than 1 percent”, actually being on the receiving end of that, feels really high. Especially, when, for five years, you’re reminded by the now dormant name of a friend on your friend’s list who died on an operating table due to complications.

  • An Old Testament Defense Against Polygamy

    The New Testament writers don’t introduce this as new — they reiterate what marriage was designed for from the beginning: a picture of Christ’s singular, covenantal love for His Church (Eph. 5:22-33), as this article will show. Polygamy doesn’t just violate a command. It corrupts that picture.

    This argument is essential for understanding and refuting the heresy of so-called “Christian” polygamists and polygynists who believe they are introducing a legitimate, alternate morality that is biblically defensible. It isn’t. It turns the theology of marriage on its head.

  • Life worth living

    For all of my love of language, one thing I struggle to get behind is the idea of “living like there is no tomorrow” or “live like you only have X amount of time to live.” I appreciate the sentiment of not wasting time — but when I take the idea to its logical conclusion,…

  • Working With My Hands: A Man Who Is Autistic

    The neurodivergent community has created a sub-culture which praises, celebrates, and honors a lack of development and immaturity. Spend any amount of time in an active neurodivergent group and you’ll see varied discussions about someone’s “current hyperfixation” or listing of disabilities like scouting merit badges. Their identity has become the disability they argue isn’t a disability.

  • Autistic Identity

    Over the last year, I “self-identified” as autistic because, well, truth be told, autism explained my life history perfectly. All of the “just” excuses became neatly explained behind autism. In spite of this, and at great personal expense, I pushed for a formal diagnosis because I needed to know for sure.

  • Neurodivergent rejecting neurodiversity worldview

    Accepting that you are “neurodivergent” does not mean accepting the ideology of “neurodiversity.” One is a descriptive label. The other is a worldview.

    Used precisely, neurodivergent describes divergence from the most statistically typical neurological profile. It is a categorization — it says nothing about power, justice, or how human beings ought to relate to one another.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *